Introduced by Rep. Kathy W. Stein (D) on February 2, 2005, to make the intentional notification of a long-term care facility of a scheduled or contemplated inspection visit a Class D felony. The bill would subject the person that violates this provision to a civil fine of $5,000 to be deposited in the cabinet's fraud, waste, and abuse recovery fund.
Referred to the House Health and Welfare Committee on February 3, 2005.
Amendment offered by Rep. Kathy W. Stein (D) on February 24, 2005, to add that violation by a state employee is grounds for dismissal. The amendment would specify that revenue from fines shall be used for the long-term care ombudsman program.
The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on February 25, 2005.
Passed in the House (88 to 3) on February 25, 2005, to make the intentional notification of a long-term care facility of a scheduled or contemplated inspection visit a Class D felony. The bill would subject the person that violates this provision to a civil fine of $5,000 to be deposited in the cabinet's fraud, waste, and abuse recovery fund. The amended bill would add that violation by a state employee is grounds for dismissal. The amended bill would specify that revenue from fines shall be used for the long-term care ombudsman program. [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the Senate on February 25, 2005.
Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on February 28, 2005.
1) 2005 House Bill 270 (Ban "tipping off" of health care facility inspections) [by admin on January 1, 2001] Introduced in the House on February 2, 2005, to make the intentional notification of a long-term care facility of a scheduled or contemplated inspection visit a Class D felony. The bill would subject the person that violates this provision to a civil fine of $5,000 to be deposited in the cabinet's fraud, waste, and abuse recovery fund. The amended bill would add that violation by a state employee is grounds for dismissal. The amended bill would specify that revenue from fines shall be used for the long-term care ombudsman program
The vote was 88 in favor, 3 opposed and 9 not voting